Here's a number that should make you curious: 1,014.
That's how many companies just received a piece of a new Pentagon contract. One thousand and fourteen. Not ten. Not fifty. One thousand and fourteen separate companies, all awarded access to compete for work on a single military project.
The project is called the Golden Dome. It's a missile defense system — a shield designed to protect the United States from ballistic missiles, hypersonic weapons, cruise missiles. The kind of thing you build when you're worried about nuclear war.
The contract ceiling is $151 billion over ten years.
Now, if you were the Pentagon, and you had $151 billion to spend on missile defense, how many companies would you hire?
You'd probably want the best. Lockheed Martin. Northrop Grumman. Raytheon. The companies that have been building missiles and radars for decades. Maybe a dozen firms. Maybe two dozen, if you wanted competition.
You would not hire 1,014 companies.
Unless you weren't just building a missile defense system.
Unless you were building something else entirely.
Let me tell you what the Golden Dome actually is.
On the surface, it's a military program. President Trump signed an executive order in January 2025 establishing the initiative. The goal, according to the order, is to create a "multi-layered" defense architecture that can protect the homeland from "aerial attacks from any foe."
That sounds reasonable. Missiles are getting faster. Hypersonic weapons can maneuver in ways that make them hard to intercept. China and Russia have been investing heavily in these technologies. A modernized defense system makes strategic sense.
But $151 billion is an extraordinary amount of money. For context, that's more than the entire annual budget of the Department of Education. It's more than NASA gets in five years. It's enough to rebuild every bridge in America.
And they're spreading it across 1,014 companies.
Why?
To understand the answer, you have to understand how Washington really works.
Every member of Congress has a district. Every district has businesses. And every business owner votes — and donates.
When a federal contract goes to a company in your district, that's jobs. That's economic activity. That's something you can talk about in your next campaign ad. "I brought $50 million in defense contracts to our community."
Now imagine a contract that goes to companies in not one district, not ten districts, but hundreds of districts. Spread across nearly every state. Touching rural communities and suburban tech parks and urban manufacturing centers.
What you've created is a constituency.
A thousand companies now have a financial interest in this program continuing. Each of those companies has employees who depend on the work. Each has executives who donate to political campaigns. Each has lobbyists who walk the halls of Congress.
If a future president tries to cut the Golden Dome, they'll face opposition from all of them. If a budget-conscious Congress tries to reduce funding, a thousand phone calls will be made. A thousand letters will be written. A thousand campaign contributions will be reconsidered.
This is how you make something uncancellable.
It's not a defense strategy. It's a political strategy. The money isn't just building a missile shield — it's building a wall of influence around the program itself.
There's another name on the list of 1,014 companies that should get your attention.
Google.
Specifically, Google Public Sector — a division you've probably never heard of. It's the arm of the company that sells cloud computing and artificial intelligence services to the government.
If you've followed Google over the years, this might surprise you.
In 2018, thousands of Google employees signed a letter protesting something called Project Maven. It was a Pentagon initiative that used artificial intelligence to analyze drone footage. The employees didn't want their work used for warfare. "We believe that Google should not be in the business of war," the letter said.
Google backed down. They declined to renew the Maven contract. The company's unofficial motto — "Don't be evil" — seemed to mean something.
That was seven years ago.
Today, Google is not just dabbling in defense. They're going all in.
Google has formed a strategic partnership with Lockheed Martin — the largest defense contractor in the world. The partnership is specifically designed to integrate Google's artificial intelligence into military systems.
Think about what that means.
Lockheed builds the missiles. They build the radars. They build the jets. But modern warfare isn't just about hardware anymore. It's about data. Processing millions of sensor inputs in real time. Identifying threats faster than any human could. Making split-second decisions about interception and response.
That's what AI does. And nobody does AI better than Google.
The Golden Dome requires exactly these capabilities. It needs to detect a hypersonic missile traveling at Mach 20. It needs to calculate the trajectory, assess the threat, coordinate the response, and launch an interceptor — all in seconds. The human brain can't do that. Traditional defense software can't do that.
Google's systems can.
So the partnership makes sense — from a military perspective. What makes it interesting from a TCT perspective is what it reveals about Google's transformation.
This is a company that once prided itself on not being evil. A company whose employees revolted at the thought of helping the Pentagon analyze drone footage.
Now they're building the brain for America's nuclear shield.
The lobbying disclosures tell the story.
Google Public Sector has registered to lobby on the National Defense Authorization Act — the annual bill that funds the military. Their filings specifically mention "missile defense," "space launch," and "intelligence."
This isn't passive. Google isn't just accepting government contracts as they come. They're actively shaping the legislation that creates those contracts.
When a company like Google lobbies on missile defense, they're not just asking for money. They're influencing the requirements. They're helping write the technical specifications — the rules that determine which capabilities the government needs.
And here's the thing about technical specifications: they tend to favor whoever helped write them.
If the Golden Dome requires "cloud-native AI integration" and "large language model processing," well, there's really only one company that can deliver that at scale. The requirements become the moat. The specifications become the barrier to entry.
Google isn't just selling to the government. They're defining what the government needs to buy.
Let me introduce you to the legislators who made this happen.
Senator Dan Sullivan represents Alaska. If you look at a map, Alaska is the closest American territory to Russia and North Korea. It's the front line of missile defense. The Ground-based Midcourse Defense interceptors — the missiles designed to shoot down incoming nuclear weapons — are stationed at Fort Greely, Alaska.
Sullivan introduced the GOLDEN DOME Act in the Senate.
Now, you might think he did this for national security reasons. Alaska is strategically important. The threat is real. That's a perfectly reasonable explanation.
But consider what else the Golden Dome does for Alaska.
The system requires sensors. Radars. Interceptors. Support infrastructure. Command centers. All of it needs to be positioned to defend against threats from the north. That means construction. That means jobs. That means billions of dollars flowing into Alaskan communities.
For Sullivan, the Golden Dome isn't just a defense bill. It's an infrastructure bill. It's an economic development package for his state, wrapped in the language of national security.
His counterpart in the House is Representative Mark Messmer of Indiana. He introduced the companion bill. Indiana is home to Naval Surface Warfare Center Crane Division — a hub for electronic warfare and strategic weapons. The Golden Dome feeds that ecosystem too.
This is how the game works. The legislators who champion these programs aren't acting against their constituents' interests. They're acting precisely in those interests. The defense of the nation and the prosperity of their districts become the same thing.
Everyone wins. Except the taxpayer who doesn't live in one of those districts.
The Spiderweb
The Pentagon — the customer. $151 billion to spend. Split across 1,014 companies. A political firewall disguised as a procurement strategy.
Google Public Sector — the new player. Once refused to help the Pentagon analyze drone footage. Now building the AI brain for nuclear defense. Lobbying Congress to shape the requirements in their favor.
Lockheed Martin — the old player. Builds the hardware. Needs Google for the software. The partnership merges Silicon Valley and the military-industrial complex into a single entity.
Senator Dan Sullivan — the sponsor. Alaska senator. Front-line state. Billions in infrastructure for his constituents. National security and economic development become indistinguishable.
Rep. Mark Messmer — the co-sponsor. Indiana congressman. Defense manufacturing hub. Same incentives. Same playbook.
1,014 Companies — the constituency. Spread across the country. Each one a reason for a legislator to vote yes. Each one a lobbyist waiting to be activated if funding is threatened.
The network isn't hidden. It's designed in the open. The brilliance is that it doesn't need to be secret. It works precisely because everyone can see their piece of the pie.
The Money Angle
Here's what the smart money sees.
The contract ceiling. $151 billion is a ceiling, not a guarantee. But ceilings become floors when the political will is there. And with 1,014 companies invested in the program's survival, the political will is structural.
Google's defense premium. Investors value Google based on advertising revenue. Search traffic. YouTube views. But the company is quietly building a new revenue stream — government contracts that don't depend on consumer sentiment or ad rates. Recession-proof. Bipartisan. Growing. The market hasn't fully priced this in.
The Alaska infrastructure play. If you want to know where the money flows first, look at the sponsors. Sullivan's Alaska will see disproportionate investment. Companies doing business in Anchorage, Fairbanks, and the surrounding areas are positioned to benefit before anyone else.
Congressional trading. Representatives on the Armed Services Committee have oversight of these contracts — and access to information about which companies will win which task orders. Some of them trade defense stocks. Rep. Pat Fallon of Texas has a documented history of trading Boeing while his committee oversaw the company. These are the portfolios to watch.
The Golden Dome is a decade-long program. The money will flow slowly, then suddenly. The positions being built today will pay off for years.
There's a phrase in Washington: "Jobs are policy."
It means that when you want to pass legislation, you don't talk about abstract principles. You talk about jobs. You point to the factory in the congressman's district. You count the employees. You name the towns that will benefit.
The Golden Dome is the perfection of this strategy.
It's not a missile defense system that happens to create jobs. It's a jobs program that happens to defend against missiles. The 1,014 companies aren't a bug — they're the feature. They're the reason this program will survive any future administration, any future Congress, any future budget crisis.
The spice must flow. And the spice is $151 billion.
Google understood this. That's why they're at the table. Lockheed understood this. That's why they partnered with Google. Sullivan and Messmer understood this. That's why their names are on the bill.
The question isn't whether the Golden Dome will be built. The question is who will profit from building it.
Now you have the map.
[Join the War Room →]